Role of Bisoprolol in Heart Failure Management: A Consensus Statement from India.

In India, heart failure (HF) is an important health concern affecting younger age groups than the western population. A limited number of Indian patients receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Selective ß-1 blockers (BB) are one of the GDMTs in HF and play an important role by decreasing the sympathetic overdrive. The BB reduces heart rate (HR) reverse the adverse cardiac (both ventricular and atrial), vascular, and renovascular remodeling seen in HF. Bisoprolol, a ß-1 blocker, has several advantages and can be used across a wide spectrum of HF presentations and in patients with HF and comorbid conditions such as coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation (AF), post-myocardial infarction (MI), uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, and renal impairment. Despite its advantages, bisoprolol is not optimally utilized for managing HF in India. This consensus builds on updated evidence on the efficacy and safety of bisoprolol in HF and recommends its place in therapy with a focus on Indian patients with HF.

Remuscularization with triiodothyronine and ß1-blocker therapy reverses post-ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and adverse remodeling.

Renewal of the myocardium by preexisting cardiomyocytes is a powerful strategy for restoring the architecture and function of hearts injured by myocardial infarction. To advance this strategy, we show that combining two clinically approved drugs, but neither alone, muscularizes the heart through cardiomyocyte proliferation. Specifically, in adult murine cardiomyocytes, metoprolol, a cardioselective ß1-adrenergic receptor blocker, when given with triiodothyronine (T3, a thyroid hormone) accentuates the ability of T3 to stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation and proliferative signaling by inhibiting expression of the nuclear phospho-ERK1/2-specific phosphatase, dual-specificity phosphatase-5. While short-duration metoprolol plus T3 therapy generates new heart muscle in healthy mice, in mice with myocardial infarction-induced left ventricular dysfunction and pathological remodeling, it remuscularizes the heart, restores contractile function and reverses chamber dilatation; outcomes that are enduring. If the beneficial effects of metoprolol plus T3 are replicated in humans, this therapeutic strategy has the potential to definitively address ischemic heart failure.

Randomized Trial of Metoprolol in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The use of ß-adrenergic receptor blocking agents in symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) rests on clinical experience and observational cohort studies. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effects of metoprolol on left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, symptoms, and exercise capacity in patients with obstructive HCM. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial enrolled 29 patients with obstructive HCM and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or higher symptoms from May 2018 to September 2020. Patients received metoprolol or placebo for 2 consecutive 2-week periods in random order. The effect parameters were LVOT gradients, NYHA functional class, Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS), and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the LVOT gradient during metoprolol was lower at rest (25 mm Hg [interquartile range (IQR): 15-58 mm Hg] vs 72 mm Hg [IQR: 28-87 mm Hg]; P = 0.007), at peak exercise (28 mm Hg [IQR: 18-40 mm Hg] vs 62 mm Hg [IQR: 31-113 mm Hg]; P < 0.001), and postexercise (45 mm Hg [IQR: 24-100 mm Hg] vs 115 mm Hg [IQR: 55-171 mm Hg]; P < 0.0001). During metoprolol treatment, 14% of patients were in NYHA functional class III or higher compared with 38% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.01). Similarly, no patients were in CCS class III or higher during metoprolol treatment compared with 10% during placebo treatment (P < 0.01). These findings were confirmed by higher KCCQ-OSS during metoprolol treatment (76.2 ± 16.2 vs 73.8 ± 19.5; P = 0.039). Measures of exercise capacity, peak oxygen consumption, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide did not differ between the study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, metoprolol reduced LVOT obstruction at rest and during exercise, provided symptom relief, and improved quality of life in patients with obstructive HCM. Maximum exercise capacity remained unchanged. (The Effect of Metoprolol in Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy [TEMPO]; NCT03532802).

Ivabradine versus bisoprolol in the treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a long-term follow-up study.

AIM: The aim of our study was to compare ivabradine versus bisoprolol in the short-term and long-term treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia. METHODS: From this prospective, parallel-group, open-label study, consecutive patients affected by inappropriate sinus tachycardia received ivabradine or bisoprolol and were evaluated with Holter ECG, ECG stress test, European Heart Rhythm Association score and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire at baseline, after 3 and 24 months. RESULTS: Overall, 40 patients were enrolled. Baseline parameters were comparable in the ivabradine and bisoprolol subgroups. Two patients had transient phosphenes with ivabradine and two others interrupted the drug after 3 months as they planned to become pregnant. Eight individuals treated with bisoprolol experienced hypotension and weakness, which caused drug discontinuation in five of them. Ivabradine was superior to bisoprolol in reducing Holter ECG mean heart rate (HR) and mean HR during daytime at short- and long-term follow-up. Moreover, ivabradine but not bisoprolol significantly reduced Holter ECG mean HR during night-time as well as maximal and minimal HR and significantly increased the time duration and maximal load reached at ECG stress test. The quality of life questionnaires significantly improved in both subgroups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that ivabradine is better tolerated than bisoprolol and seems to be superior in controlling the heart rate and improving exercise capacity in a small population of individuals affected by inappropriate sinus tachycardia during a short-term and long-term follow-up.

ß-Blockade for Patients with Hypertension, Ischemic Heart Disease or Heart Failure: Where are We Now?

ß-blockers are a heterogeneous class of drugs, with varying selectivity/specificity for ß1 vs ß2 receptors, intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), and vasodilatory properties (through ß2 stimulation, α receptor blockade or nitric oxide release). These drugs are indicated for the management of arterial hypertension, heart failure or ischemic heart disease (IHD; eg angina pectoris or prior myocardial infarction). Most of the benefit of ß-blockade in these conditions arises from blockade of the ß1 receptor, and, in practice, the addition of ISA appears to reduce the potential for improved clinical outcomes in people with heart failure or IHD. Aspects of the benefit/risk balance of ß-blockers remain controversial, and recent meta-analyses have shed new light on this issue. We have reviewed the current place of cardioselective ß-blockade in hypertension, IHD and heart failure, with special reference to the therapeutic profile of a highly selective ß1-adrenoceptor blocker, bisoprolol.

National Estimates of CKD Prevalence and Potential Impact of Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate Without Race.

BACKGROUND: The implications of removing the adjustment for Black race in equations to eGFR on the prevalence of CKD and management strategies are incompletely understood. METHODS: We estimated changes in CKD prevalence and the potential effect on therapeutic drug prescriptions and prediction of kidney failure if race adjustment were removed from the CKD-EPI GFR estimating equation. We used cross-sectional and longitudinal data from adults aged ≥18 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2015 to 2016, and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System in 2015. In the VA cohort, we assessed use of common medications that require dose adjustment on the basis of kidney function, and compared the prognostic accuracy of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation with versus without race adjustment of eGFR. RESULTS: The prevalence of CKD among Black adults increased from 5.2% to 10.6% in NHANES, and from 12.4% to 21.6% in the VA cohort after eliminating race adjustment. Among Black veterans, 41.0% of gabapentin users, 33.5% of ciprofloxacin users, 24.0% of metformin users, 6.9% of atenolol users, 6.6% of rosuvastatin users, and 5.8% of tramadol users were reclassified to a lower eGFR for which dose adjustment or discontinuation is recommended. Without race adjustment of eGFR, discrimination of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation among Black adults remained high and calibration was marginally improved overall, with better calibration at higher levels of predicted risk. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of race adjustment from CKD-EPI eGFR would double the estimated prevalence of CKD among Black adults in the United States. Such a change is likely to affect a sizeable number of drug-dosing decisions. It may also improve the accuracy of kidney failure risk prediction among higher-risk Black adults.

Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy (PRADA): Extended Follow-Up of a 2×2 Factorial, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Candesartan and Metoprolol.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant breast cancer therapy containing anthracyclines with or without anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 antibodies and radiotherapy is associated with cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction. In the PRADA trial (Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy), concomitant treatment with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan attenuated the reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in women receiving treatment for breast cancer, whereas the ß-blocker metoprolol attenuated the increase in cardiac troponins. This study aimed to assess the long-term effects of candesartan and metoprolol or their combination to prevent a reduction in cardiac function and myocardial injury. METHODS: In this 2×2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-center trial, patients with early breast cancer were assigned to concomitant treatment with candesartan cilexetil, metoprolol succinate, or matching placebos. Target doses were 32 and 100 mg, respectively. Study drugs were discontinued after adjuvant therapy. All 120 validly randomized patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome measure was change in LVEF assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging from baseline to extended follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included changes in left ventricular volumes, echocardiographic peak global longitudinal strain, and circulating cardiac troponin concentrations. RESULTS: A small decline in LVEF but no significant between-group differences were observed from baseline to extended follow-up, at a median of 23 months (interquartile range, 21 to 28 months) after randomization (candesartan, 1.7% [95% CI, 0.5 to 2.8]; no candesartan, 1.8% [95% CI, 0.6 to 3.0]; metoprolol, 1.6% [95% CI, 0.4 to 2.7]; no metoprolol, 1.9% [95% CI, 0.7 to 3.0]). Candesartan treatment during adjuvant therapy was associated with a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume compared with the noncandesartan group (P=0.021) and attenuated decline in global longitudinal strain (P=0.046) at 2 years. No between-group differences in change in cardiac troponin I and T concentrations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer was associated with a decline in LVEF during extended follow-up. Candesartan during adjuvant therapy did not prevent reduction in LVEF at 2 years, but was associated with modest reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume and preserved global longitudinal strain. These results suggest that a broadly administered cardioprotective approach may not be required in most patients with early breast cancer without preexisting cardiovascular disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01434134.

Performance of a cardiac lipid panel compared to four prognostic scores in chronic heart failure.

The cardiac lipid panel (CLP) is a novel panel of metabolomic biomarkers that has previously shown to improve the diagnostic and prognostic value for CHF patients. Several prognostic scores have been developed for cardiovascular disease risk, but their use is limited to specific populations and precision is still inadequate. We compared a risk score using the CLP plus NT-proBNP to four commonly used risk scores: The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), Framingham risk score (FRS), Barcelona bio-HF (BCN Bio-HF) and Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score. We included 280 elderly CHF patients from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly trial. Cox Regression and hierarchical cluster analysis was performed. Integrated area under the curves (IAUC) was used as criterium for comparison. The mean (SD) follow-up period was 81 (33) months, and 95 (34%) subjects met the primary endpoint. The IAUC for FRS was 0.53, SHFM 0.61, BCN Bio-HF 0.72, MAGGIC 0.68, and CLP 0.78. Subjects were partitioned into three risk clusters: low, moderate, high with the CLP score showing the best ability to group patients into their respective risk cluster. A risk score composed of a novel panel of metabolite biomarkers plus NT-proBNP outperformed other common prognostic scores in predicting 10-year cardiovascular death in elderly ambulatory CHF patients. This approach could improve the clinical risk assessment of CHF patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Propranolol vs Atenolol in Infants With Problematic Infantile Hemangiomas: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Propranolol has become the first-line therapy for problematic infantile hemangiomas (IHs) that require systemic therapy. However, different adverse events have been reported during propranolol treatment. The positive efficacy and safety of atenolol raise the question of whether it could be used as a promising therapy for IH. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of propranolol vs atenolol in infants (between age 5 and 20 weeks) with problematic IHs who required systemic therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial conducted in collaboration among 6 separate investigation sites in China from February 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. A total of 377 patients met the criteria for inclusion and were randomized to the propranolol (190 [50.4%]) and atenolol (187 [49.6%]) groups. Data were analyzed in June 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either propranolol or atenolol for at least 6 months. They completed efficacy assessments at 2 years after the initial treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was any response or nonresponse at 6 months. The key secondary outcome was changes in the hemangioma activity score. Results: Of 377 participants, 287 (76.1%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 10.2 (4.0) weeks in the propranolol group and 9.8 (4.1) weeks in the atenolol group. After 6 months of treatment, in the propranolol and atenolol groups, the overall response rates were 93.7% and 92.5%, respectively (difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -4.1% to 6.6%). At 1 and 4 weeks after treatment, and thereafter, the hemangioma activity score in the atenolol group aligned with the propranolol group (odds ratio, 1.034; 95% CI, 0.886-1.206). No differences between the propranolol group and atenolol group were observed in successful initial responses, quality of life scores, complete ulceration healing times, or the rebound rate. Both groups presented a similar percentage of complete/nearly complete responses at 2 years (82.1% vs 79.7%; difference, 2.4%; 95% CI, -5.9% to 10.7%). Adverse events were more common in the propranolol group (70.0% vs 44.4%; difference, 25.6%; 95% CI, 15.7%-34.8%), but the frequency of severe adverse events did not differ meaningfully between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, when compared with propranolol, atenolol had similar efficacy and fewer adverse events in the treatment of infants with problematic IHs. The results suggest that oral atenolol can be used as an alternative treatment option for patients with IH who require systemic therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT02342275.

Beta-Adrenergic Antagonists and Cancer Specific Survival in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Veterans Administration Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To interrogate the National Veterans Health Administration (VA) database to determine if beta-blocker use at time of initiation of androgen therapy deprivation (ADT) would result in improved oncological outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: All men diagnosed with high risk PCa (PSA >20) from 2000-2008 who were on ADT ≥ 6 months were identified. Patients receiving ADT concurrently with primary radiation therapy were excluded. Pharmacy data was interrogated for all beta-blockers, but then focused on the selective beta-1 blocker metoprolol. Cox proportional hazards ratios were calculated for overall survival (OS), PCa specific survival (CSS) and skeletal related events (SREs). RESULTS: In 39,198 patients with high risk PCa on ADT, use of any beta-blocker was not associated with improvement in OS, CSS, or SREs. Further analyses focusing on metoprolol found that 10,224 (31.9%) had used metoprolol while 21,834 had no beta-blocker use. Multivariable analysis with Inverse Propensity Score Weighting, adjusted for factors including PSA, Gleason score, and duration ADT, found that utilization of metoprolol was not associated with improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, P = .19), CSS (HR 0.94, P = .23) or SREs (HR 0.98, P = .79). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort, metoprolol use in conjunction with ADT in high risk PCa was not associated with improvement in OS, CSS, or risk of SRE. In contrast to a recent smaller clinical study, our data strongly suggests no cancer specific benefit to beta-blocker use in advanced PCa.

Rate Versus Rhythm Control in Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy Patients with Persistent Atrial Flutter.

Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) is a potentially reversible cardiomyopathy caused by tachyarrhythmia. For atrial flutter (AFL) -induced TIC, a rhythm control strategy, such as catheter ablation, has been recommended. However, the efficacy of rate control has remained unclear due to the difficulty of achieving control using arrhythmic medications.We prospectively assessed 47 symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and suspected persistent AFL-induced TIC. Patients were divided into the rhythm control strategy (n = 22; treatment with catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion) and rate control strategy (n = 25; treatment with bisoprolol) groups. The latter was further divided into the strict rate control strategy (average heart rate < 80 bpm) and lenient rate control strategy (average heart rate < 110 bpm) subgroups. The primary outcome was left ventricular (LV) function recovery, which was defined as an increase in LVEF ≥ 20% or to a value of ≥ 55% after 6 months.In the rhythm control strategy group, more patients achieved LV function recovery after 6 months (95.2% versus 60.9%, P = 0.010). The cumulative incidence of worsening HF events was significantly higher in the rate control strategy group than in the rhythm control strategy group (hazard ratio, 4.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-21.57). The subgroup study revealed the advantage of the strict rate control strategy for achieving LV function recovery (83.3% versus 36.4%, P = 0.036).The rate control strategy was significantly inferior to the rhythm control strategy for the LV function recovery in TIC patients with persistent AFL. Our findings suggest that the strict rate control strategy should be aimed if the rhythm control strategy cannot be performed.

Effect of metoprolol tartrate tablets and recombinant human B-type natriuretic peptide on the sudden cardiac death and malignant arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure.

To explore the effect of metoprolol tartrate tablets and recombinant human natriuretic peptide B (NPPB) on sudden cardiac death and malignant arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction and patients with heart failure (AMI-HF). A total of 105 AMI-HF patients treatedfrom January 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into Group I (n=53) and Group II (n=52). Both groups received conventional treatment, and Group II was additionally treated with metoprolol tartrate tablets and NPPB. The clinical observation indicators of the two groups of patients were compared. Group II had better left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p<0.05). The standard deviation of NN (R-R) interval (SDNN), mean NN (R-R), root mean square of continuous difference (RMSSD) and the percentage of difference between adjacent RR intervals >50ms (pNN50) increased after treatment, with more increase in the Group II (p<0.05). Group II obtained significantly lower levels of B type natriuretic peptide (BNP),N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP), interleukin (IL)-6 and hs-CRP in contrast to Group I (p<0.05). Markedly higher total response rates were observed in Group II (p<0.05). The combination of metoprolol tartrate tablets and NPPB is effective in treating AMI-HF.

Evaluation of esmolol for heart rate control in patients with acute aortic dissection.

PURPOSE: Acute aortic dissection is a serious and life-threatening condition that requires prompt, effective management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esmolol for heart rate control in patients with acute aortic dissection in the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive analysis of patients treated for type A or type B acute aortic dissection in the ED at an academic medical center. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving strict (≤60 bpm) or lenient (≤80 bpm) heart rate control within the first 60 min of therapy at the study site. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure of ≤60 mmHg. RESULTS: Of 266 patients screened, 40 patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-three patients (82.5%) attained lenient rate control within the first 60 min of esmolol therapy. Eleven patients (27.5%) achieved a strict heart rate goal within the first 60 min of esmolol therapy. Five patients (12.5%) experienced an episode of hypotension during the first 3 h of esmolol therapy. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with esmolol infusion for acute aortic dissection, a lenient HR goal was achieved in most patients. In contrast, esmolol was not associated with attainment of strict HR control in most patients included in this sample. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the exact role of esmolol in acute aortic dissection in a larger patient population.

An attempt at administering a transdermal formulation of bisoprolol in patients with acute cardiac symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Bisono® is the world's first transdermal formulation of a bisoprolol, which is approved for the treatment of hypertension in Japan. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of this formulation in patients who were admitted to our hospital with cardiac symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome or an acute exacerbation of heart failure. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective survey of medical records from September 1, 2017 to April 30, 2018 obtained from the Cardiovascular Center of Kyoto Katsura Hospital. The clinical data of patients on admission who had received a transdermal formula of bisoprolol (Bisono® tape) were retrieved; their blood pressure and heart rate data were analyzed in relation to the doses of Bisono® tape administered. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients received the Bisono® tape. Their final diagnoses included acute myocardial infarction, an exacerbation of heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. While there was no significant correlation observed between the administered doses of the drug and reduction in blood pressure achieved within 24 h after admission, there was a significant (p < 0.05) correlation between the doses of Bisono®tnd reduction in the heart rate within 24 h after admission (ΔHR0-24 h). Only one patient who received 8 mg of Bisono® exhibited temporal bradycardia (heart rate < 50 bpm). CONCLUSION: The transdermal formulation of bisoprolol may be useful for the early introduction of ß-blockers in patients admitted with cardiac symptoms associated with myocardial ischemia or heart failure. However, caution should be exercised because of the possible risk of hypotension.

Beta-1 blocker reduces inflammation and preserves intestinal barrier function after open abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Open abdominal surgery is frequently related to excessive inflammation and a compromised intestinal barrier, leading to poor clinical outcomes. The administration of beta-1 blocker has been shown to effectively reduce inflammation and preserve intestinal barrier function in patients with sepsis, shock, or other critical illnesses. The underlying mechanism of these effects may be associated with the autonomic nervous system's activation via cholecystokinin receptors. This study aimed to investigate the effect of beta-1 blocker on systemic and local inflammatory responses and the intestinal barrier function in the context of open abdominal surgery. METHODS: A rat model of open abdominal surgery was induced through peritoneal air exposure for 3 hours and treated via gavage with the beta-1 blocker, metoprolol, or saline. Cholecystokinin-receptor antagonists were administered before the metoprolol treatment. Peritoneal lavage fluid, serum, and tissues were collected 24 hours after surgery to determine systemic and local inflammation and intestinal integrity. RESULTS: The intervention with metoprolol significantly reduced serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 (P < .05) and peritoneal interleukin-6 (P < .01) compared with those of animals treated with saline. The intestinal myeloperoxidase indicating the influx of neutrophils was also significantly prevented by the administration of metoprolol (P < .05). Above all, this intervention resulted in a significant decrease in serum D-lactate and intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, intestinal permeability, bacterial translocation, and Chiu's score for intestinal mucosa injury (P < .05). However, the anti-inflammatory and intestinal integrity protective effects of metoprolol were prevented by the blockage of cholecystokinin receptors (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that beta-1 blocker reduces systemic and local inflammatory responses and preserves intestinal barrier function after open abdominal surgery through a mechanism that depends on cholecystokinin receptors. Clinically, these findings imply that perioperative intervention with a beta-1 blocker may be an effective new therapy to enhance recovery after open abdominal surgery.

Celiprolol Treatment in Patients with Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is a rare monogenetic disease caused by pathogenic variants in procollagen 3A1. Arterial rupture is the most serious clinical manifestation. A randomised controlled trial, the Beta-Blockers in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Treatment (BBEST) trial, reported a significant protective effect of the beta blocker celiprolol. The aim was to study the outcome of celiprolol treatment in a cohort of Swedish patients with vEDS. METHODS: Uppsala is a national referral centre for patients with vEDS. They are assessed by vascular surgeons, angiologists, and clinical geneticists. Family history, previous and future clinical events, medication, and side effects are registered. Celiprolol was administered twice daily and titrated up to a maximum dose of 400 mg daily. Logistic regression was used to analyse predictors of vascular events. RESULTS: Forty patients with pathogenic sequence variants in COL3A1 were offered treatment with celiprolol in the period 2011-2019. The median follow up was 22 months (range 1-98 months); total follow up was 106 patient years. In two patients, uptitration of the dose is ongoing. Of the remaining 38, 26 (65%) patients reached the target dose of 400 mg daily. Dose uptitration was unsuccessful in six patients because of side effects; one died before reaching the maximum dose, and five terminated the treatment. Five major vascular events occurred; four were fatal (ruptured ascending aorta; aortic rupture after type B dissection; ruptured cerebral aneurysm; and ruptured pulmonary artery). One bled from a branch of the internal iliac artery, which was successfully coiled endovascularly. The annual risk of a major vascular event was 4.7% (n = 5/106), similar to the treatment arm of the BBEST trial (5%) and lower than in the control arm of the same trial (12%). No significant predictor of vascular events was identified. CONCLUSION: Treatment with celiprolol is tolerated in most patients with vEDS. Despite fatal vascular events, these observations suggest that celiprolol may have a protective effect in vEDS.